Just imagine playing Gauntlet, a game where twin stick actions are extremely constant, with that type of style. And it's extremely naive to even try to begin to claim that the click to move procedure in Magicka: Wizard Wars is a better way to handle twinstick action than traditional WASD movement.

well, optional, does it really have to be explained in black and white for everyone? Not everyone is of the same hand size and hand dexterity nor the same hardware setup. When it would be something that would be. Originally posted by I give thy mum unto thee:Since you're all so confident that WASD movement are a great idea, what changes do you propose? Obviously, movement would be on WASD, but where would the elements, magicks and cast types be? Maybe you can make me and other people change our minds and get more supporters. It should, of course, be optional for those who want a higher skill ceiling and don't want to be artificially limited by lacking control schemes. If it's impossible to aim irrespective of your movement with the keyboard and mouse setup which is in contrast to playing with a controller, I'd say that WASD should be implemented. If there's only one method of moving, which would be your mouse, then I'm not sure how something like the scenario I'm describing would work, if at all. What I'm wondering is, how does something like that happen on a keyboard and mouse setup if there is no WASD movement? For example, in Gauntlet (And yes, I know you're not Arrowhead, but Gauntlet is an easy example) you move with WASD and aim with your cursor on the keyboard and mouse setup.

One joystick to move and the other to aim, neither aim nor movement restricting the other. In other words, being able to move backwards while freely aiming about a beam for example. It would seem as though you're able to aim irrespective of your movement on controllers.

Magica 2 vs helldivers